How do we help a generation damned by a lack of any work ethic?

How do we help a generation damned by a lack of any work ethic?

Those of you who know me personally or have followed this blog for any length of time will know that I read a lot of books. A while back I read a book entitled, ‘Toxic Charity:How the Church Hurts Those They Help (and How to Reverse It)’. I will enclose a short review here, although this is not the main point of this article.

The book has 10 chapters and is written by Robert L Lupton, the founder of FCS Urban Ministries. His aim is to help Christian churches to think more carefully about the kind of ‘help’ they are giving to the poor and oppressed, particularly tin the Two Thirds World. According to Lupton, ‘good intentions‘ whilst admirable are, often, dangerous and counter productive to those we are seeking to help if we have not thought through the implications seriously beforehand. Instead of encouraging dependency, according to Lupton, we should be looking at ways in which our giving and/or helping can produce more independency.

This is a really helpful book for those of us working in areas where ‘toxic charity’ is a real concern. I recommend that you buy a copy, digest it slowly and make your own conclusions. Consider the following quote:

For disadvantaged people to flourish into their full, God-given potential, they must leave behind dependencies that impede their growth. Initiatives that thwart their development, though rightly motivated, must be restructured to reinforce self-sufficiency if they are to become agents of lasting and positive change.

As we enter 2012 and survey the community of Niddrie we have identified certain key areas we would like to explore. One of them is the commencement of an initiative that focuses on developing small businesses that employ local people, in order to try to generate some low-level stimulation of the Niddrie economy. Now, although these ideas are sound, we face do face some serious stumbling blocks. According to Lupton (speaking about microloans):

Experienced microlending organisations have identified three essential elements for successful microloans: The borrower must have: (1) an ingrained work ethic, (2) a demonstrated entrepreneurial instinct, and (3) a stable support system. Like legs on a three-legged stool, all three must undergird the borrower or the transaction will not stand.

Now back in the old days, and there are still vestiges of it here in Niddrie, many locals would have worked hard, sometimes with 2 or 3 jobs to boost their income. Sadly, the advent of the welfare state and the huge upsurge in the drug culture (prescribed and otherwise) have left us with a hardcore subculture with no work ethic, no drive and no family support system. People have no motivation to work hard whatsoever because, ultimately, they know the state will bail them out as it has done for generations. Generally, people are happy ‘getting by’ with their Giros and subsidising their income with a few ‘deals’ (usually crime related) here and there.

Niddrie is not Africa or some other Two Thirds World nation where people have a more entrepreneurial spirit. Many people in these nations will work hard doing almost anything in an effort to provide for their families and they think nothing of working 18 hour days (there are also many who are lazy bums too!). Of course, the advantage in many of these countries (and I saw it first hand in Brasil) is that people aren’t subject to the same tight governmental regulations and financial restraints when it comes to business start-ups and entrepreneurial endeavours. But, still, ask the average Niddron who comes into our cafe what their dream is and they will look at you blankly. As for a stable support system, forget it. The abused child of yesteryear dragged up by an alcoholic dad and a Valium loving mother is now a ‘parent‘ himself (I use that term purposely as we are seeing an increasing number of ‘mothers’ going awol here). It is tragic. How do we even begin to put into practice some of our ‘community stimulus’  ideas when individualism and familial breakdown is pretty much the standard on our scheme for so many of those who need our help and support? The answer is at once obvious, yet appears to many, at first glance, to be trite and far too simplistic. I will state it nonetheless.

We must continue to preach the only, true saving gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ more loudly and clearly, praying for deep, personal spiritual revival and renewal in the minds and hearts of our listeners.

There it is. Read it again. We must preach Christ and Him crucified. We must never present Him as a self-help option or as someone who has come to make their life better or to give them another handout. He came to call all of us to ‘deny self and pick up our cross daily.’ He is calling all of us to a life of ongoing repentance. I truly believe that only a move of God’s Holy Spirit in a person’s life is going to motivate them toward a life of constructive independency. Before that happens they need to be born again. No spiritual renewal = no physical and communal renewal. Fact. Now, many of my dearest and most respected friends will argue that the main job of the church is to proclaim the gospel and leave the rest of this stuff up to the state or other outside agencies. I wholeheartedly agree.

The issue comes in dealing with the new believer who has spent the last 30 years of his life in a drug induced daze, sponging off the state and living at home with his girlfriend and 3 children. Oh, and not to mention the other 4 children he has to 3 other women on the scheme. He now becomes our ‘problem’ as we work out what biblical discipleship looks like for him. How do we encourage him to begin to make a positive contribution to society instead of just taking all of the time? How can we disentangle him from a benefits system that actually leaves him financially better off unemployed?

At NCC we want to start to develop a system of micro-businesses in the coming year but we want to do it in partnership with those who have been spiritually awakened and have shown evidence of working hard, and lawfully, for a concerted period under our supervision and care. At the moment, we encourage people to volunteer in the community cafe and to help with the maintenance of the building as a first step on the ladder. Those who are after a free ride soon get fed up and leave, but those who really want to move on with their lives stay and work hard. It is about the only system we have in place at the moment to separate the wheat from the chaff. In the long-term, we want to encourage apprenticeship schemes with local schoolchildren to show them opportunities other than the benefits route taken by generations of other family members.

As yet, we haven’t come up with a workable strategy. I suspect we will muddle along, make mistakes and come out the other end all the wiser. Any and all suggestions are seriously welcomed. I do know that however we structure things here we need to (1) Keep the gospel the main thing, (2) keep the local church as the centre of all we are doing, (3) see all projects as a means for gospel proclamation and/or ongoing discipleship, (4) ensure that all income generated is reinvested into the community, and (5) is timetabled to ensure future, indigenous leadership.

Pray for us as we think things through. I will write further on these issues.

4 Comments

    Gloria

    So much to think about and lots of practical considerations to make. I read your article and was struck by how easy it is to despair if we don’t consider the efficacy of the cross. Thanks, Mez!

    Colin

    With the current fashion in conservative evangelicalism for social action (some of those who go on about it, seem to think they are amazingly radical), I have seen very little thought on the issues you have raised above.

    Evangelicals seem very keen to set up ‘good works’ with very little thought of their effects in the medium to long term and even how they will be perceived by their recipients in our post welfare society. There also seem to me big diffs when we set up social projects as a means to ‘get along side people’ and get the gospel to them further down the line, as they will see ‘bait and switch’.

    None of the above stops us loving our neighbour with what we are able to do, but as you have identified it is very complicated, as we may think we are a being a tremendous witness, but to those who ‘use’ us, we are but one more service, with little difference between us and the council.

    Personally I agree with you (and your points 1 to 3) and have just seen the more social elements of my churches witness as a means to share the gospel and don’t go for any of this transformational language which these days seems to go along with it.

    Colin

      mezmcconnell

      Thanks so much for your reply Collin – very helpful. As you rightly say, conservative evangelicalism has arrived about 30 years late on the theological issue of God and the poor and most of the thought (if I can call it that) is more reactionary rather than with long term goals in mind.

      The transfomational language is confusing and also highly suspect if people think that our primary responsibility is to transform society. It is to preach Christ and disciple those in our care.

      Thanks again for your insight.
      Mez

Commenting has been turned off.